204 | 2023 Cal-Peculiarities ©2023 Seyfarth Shaw LLP www.seyfarth.com Oakland. Under Measure FF, passed in 2014, the minimum wage rises with cost-of-living increases. The minimum wage from January 1, 2021 to January 1, 2022 was $15.06.39 On January 1, 2023, the minimum wage was raised to $15.97 under Measure FF for non-hotel employees.40 Under Oakland’s Measure Z (section 5.93), starting January 1, 2023, the hotel minimum wage increased from $16.38 to $17.37 per hour with health benefits, and from $21.84 to $23.15 per hour without health benefits.41 Palo Alto. Palo Alto raised the minimum wage to $15.00 in January 2019 and $15.65 in January 2021.42 Effective January 1, 2022, the minimum wage rate for the City of Palo Alto was increased to $16.45.43 On January 1, 2023, the minimum wage rate for the City of Palo Alto was increased to $17.25.44 Richmond. The minimum wage was $15.54 since January 2022 and increased to $16.17 on January 1, 2023.45 San Diego. The minimum wage was $15.00 since January 1, 2022 and increased to $16.30 on January 1, 2023.46 San Jose. The minimum wage was $16.20 since January 2022 and increased to $17.00 on January 1, 2023.47 Santa Monica. The Santa Monica ordinance generally tracks the minimum wage requirements of Los Angeles County.48 The minimum wage reached $15.00 as of July 2021.49 Starting on July 1, 2022, the minimum wage was increased to $15.96 per hour.50 It increases by the annual Consumer Price Index thereafter, which Santa Monica posts annually on or near January 1.51 The minimum wage beginning on July 1, 2023 will be $16.90. The wage for hotels and businesses operating on hotel property matches the City of Los Angeles Citywide Hotel Worker Minimum Wage Rate; Santa Monica will post new rates annually on or near May 15.52 7.3 Pay For Hours Worked 7.3.1 Statutory right to recover contractual pay Federal law empowers employees to sue employers for statutorily guaranteed minimum and overtime wages, but not for employer failures to pay higher, contractually promised, wages. In California it’s different. California employees can sue under the Labor Code to recover wages required by either statute or contract.53 7.3.2 California counts as hours worked any time subject to the employer’s control The “hours worked” concept is central to both federal and California law. But the California concept is broader, requiring employers to pay wages where federal law does not. Federal law considers time worked if it is spent predominantly for the employer’s benefit, as opposed to the employee’s benefit. California is different in two significant respects. First, California defines “hours worked” as “the time during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer, and includes all the time the employee is suffered or permitted to work, whether or not required to do so.”54 California law thus applies a broader definition of “hours worked” than the FLSA does.55 Second, while the federal Portal-to-Portal Act specifies that employers need not pay for “walking, riding, or traveling to and from the actual place of performance of the principal activity or activities … [the] employee is employed to perform,” or for “activities … preliminary to or postliminary to [the] principal activity or activities,” California law applies a broader standard. Nonetheless, California law does require, as under federal law, that the employer knew or should have known of the time alleged to be hours worked.56 Cases dramatically illustrate California’s extraordinarily broad concept of hours worked. The Ninth Circuit, in a 2020 case interpreting California law, ruled in favor of truck drivers claiming minimum wages for the time they
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTkwMTQ4